Questions about Ivermectin Failure Study

Asking Questions - Part Twenty-One

Last night, when I had a few minutes to see headlines and top news stories, I came across this one from the New York Times.

The New York Times @nytimes

Breaking News: Ivermectin failed as a Covid treatment, a large clinical trial found. The drug surged in popularity despite no strong evidence that it worked.

nyti.msIvermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds“At some point it will become a waste of resources to continue studying an unpromising approach,” one expert said.

So I was curious and had the following questions.

1. What are the biases in the study? The Surgisphere study about the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine on COVID that was retracted by NEJM and the Lancet caused me to raise an alarm and ask questions on all research studies.

2. Will this be covered by anyone else in the mainstream media? Usually, when a study just gets reported very quietly with nothing else, a red flag is raised for me.

3. Who else will comment on social media about this and what are their biases? Who knows how to breakdown a medical research study?

And after asking these questions, I found these two threads from two people who have been calling balls and strikes very fairly for the past 2+ years.

First, Alexandros Marino’s, who wrote about this problems of this study in his Substack FOUR WEEKS AGO.

What went wrong with the TOGETHER trial?

The second is Chris Martenson, who has spent the past two years breaking down EVERYTHING related to Covid in a very fair and balanced way.

Chris "Early Treatment" Martenson, PhD @chrismartenson

🧵The TOGETHER trial purports to show that Ivermectin doesn't provide any benefit. It's given top billing in the NEJM and is now splashed everywhere on the medical news. It's a completely awful study that should not have passed review. nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105…

Clearly, it shows many red flags and alarms with this study. I have even more questions such as why have researchers not tried a study on multi-treatment approach for Covid, which worked for me.

The closest to a study is the paper by Dr. Brian Tyson and Dr. George Fareed, but they refused to do a randomized control trial, which I do not blame them because that is unethical.

But now you fully understand why I ask a lot of questions before posting my opinion.

---

I have been showing my solidarity toward the Medical Freedom movement by wearing my Medical Freedom wristband. I am working with Mathew Crawford, who runs the very successful Rounding the Earth Substack, on Operation Uplift Wristband. If you’re interested in purchasing wristbands, please email us at operationuplift@protonmail.com.

Here are the prices, which includes shipping in the United States. You will need to pay for shipping if you live outside of the US.
10 for $8
50 for $30
100 for $50
500 for $175

There have been many strides that have made by very brave people in the Medical Freedom movement. We must continue to stand up against the medical tyranny that has devastated humanity around the world not just during COVID, but also for the past generation.

Lastly, this Substack will never do what other social media feeds have done and ridicule, harass and taunt people based on vaccination status. Medical Freedom is for everyone, even those who want to be in the tyrannical rule of the corporatists in the medical field. Like I have said, this is much more than just COVID.